Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Thanks Mandy! Harold On 12/5/2019 1:59 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: Looks good. Mandy On 12/5/19 6:36 AM, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open Webrev:

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Looks good. Mandy On 12/5/19 6:36 AM, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open Webrev:

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Thanks Vicente! Harold On 12/5/2019 11:44 AM, Vicente Romero wrote: looks good, Vicente On 12/5/19 9:36 AM, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

looks good, Vicente On 12/5/19 9:36 AM, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open Webrev:

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Thanks Lois and Chris! Harold On 12/5/2019 9:56 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 5 Dec 2019, at 14:36, Harold Seigel > wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

> On 5 Dec 2019, at 14:36, Harold Seigel wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by > changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. > > Open Webrev: >

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Looks good. Lois On 12/5/2019 9:36 AM, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open Webrev:

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Looks good to me. Fred > On Dec 5, 2019, at 09:36, Harold Seigel wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by > changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. > > Open Webrev:

Re: RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Thanks Fred! Harold On 12/5/2019 9:50 AM, Frederic Parain wrote: Looks good to me. Fred On Dec 5, 2019, at 09:36, Harold Seigel wrote: Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[].

RFR 8235359: Simplify method Class.getRecordComponents()

Hi, Please review this small change to simplify Class.getRecordComponents() by changing the return type of getRecordComponents0() to RecordComponent[]. Open Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8235359/webrev/index.html JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235359