Re: i18n dev RFR JDK-8013254: Constructor \w need update to add the support of \p{Join_Control}

2013-05-01 Thread Alan Bateman
On 30/04/2013 22:01, Xueming Shen wrote: My apology, the webrev is at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8013254/webrev/ -Sherman On 04/30/2013 10:01 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, It appears we dropped the ball on u+200c and u+200d when we updated the simple word boundaries back to jdk7 I

Re: RFR JDK-8013254: Constructor \w need update to add the support of \p{Join_Control}

2013-05-01 Thread Mandy Chung
On 4/30/2013 2:01 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8013254/webrev/ Looks good. Mandy -Sherman On 04/30/2013 10:01 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, It appears we dropped the ball on u+200c and u+200d when we updated the simple word boundaries back to jdk7 [1]. You

RFR JDK-8013254: Constructor \w need update to add the support of \p{Join_Control}

2013-04-30 Thread Xueming Shen
Hi, It appears we dropped the ball on u+200c and u+200d when we updated the simple word boundaries back to jdk7 [1]. You can find most of the related discussion here [2]. These 2 code points are listed as one of the issues we were trying to fix but obviously the final doc and implementation

Re: RFR JDK-8013254: Constructor \w need update to add the support of \p{Join_Control}

2013-04-30 Thread Xueming Shen
My apology, the webrev is at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8013254/webrev/ -Sherman On 04/30/2013 10:01 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, It appears we dropped the ball on u+200c and u+200d when we updated the simple word boundaries back to jdk7 [1]. You can find most of the related