On 5/11/21 3:14 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi Mandy,
impressive work !
I think that the method that are a caller-sensitive adapter (the one that takes
a supplementary class as last parameter) should be annotated with a specific
JDK internal annotation,
so the link between the caller sensitive me
On 5/11/21 2:01 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
Yes, please!
To add to the list of motivations/things to remove: the current
implementation relies on the special `MagicAccessorImpl` to relax
accessibility. The notes in this class are frightening; getting rid
of it would be a mercy.
Thanks, gr
Hi Mandy,
impressive work !
I think that the method that are a caller-sensitive adapter (the one that takes
a supplementary class as last parameter) should be annotated with a specific
JDK internal annotation,
so the link between the caller sensitive method and it's adapter is obvious for
the h
Yes, please!
To add to the list of motivations/things to remove: the current
implementation relies on the special `MagicAccessorImpl` to relax
accessibility. The notes in this class are frightening; getting rid of
it would be a mercy.
On 5/11/2021 4:42 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
This draft JE
