Hi Roger,
Changed - Thanks for reviewing!
Cheers,
Julia
On 13/08/2019 14:48, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Julia,
Looks good.
In the compatibility description, I would lead with the "No behavioral
change".
Since this is part of the specification, the code (implementation) is
not relevant to the c
Hi Julia,
Looks good.
In the compatibility description, I would lead with the "No behavioral
change".
Since this is part of the specification, the code (implementation) is
not relevant to the change.
Thanks, Roger
On 8/13/19 9:33 AM, Julia Boes wrote:
Forwarding this thread to the right l
