On 04/07/2015 11:10 PM, Louis Wasserman wrote:
Could that actually be provided immutability-safely? I suppose an
append-only, fixed-length builder would be potentially safe.
I think the presented implementation *is* thread and immutability safe.
It only allows mutations from the constructin
Hi Louis,
This is nice. Amd could be even nicer. In case the estimated initial
StringBuilder capacity is exactly the final String length, then
constructing the String could skip the char[] copying step as the
StringBuilder instance does not escape. But in order to be safe, this
would have to
Could that actually be provided immutability-safely? I suppose an
append-only, fixed-length builder would be potentially safe.
Part of the trickiness there is with primitive parameters, where presizing
and doing the actual append both require calculating the size of the
primitive when converted t
