On 12/02/2013 12:46 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On 2 December 2013 19:47, Xueming Shen wrote:
That said, it might be desired to add the support of the JSR310 date/time
for the DateFormat, but it will not make jdk8.
FWIW, I think this should have been fixed in jdk 8.
https://bugs.openjdk.java
On 2 December 2013 19:47, Xueming Shen wrote:
> That said, it might be desired to add the support of the JSR310 date/time
> for the DateFormat, but it will not make jdk8.
FWIW, I think this should have been fixed in jdk 8.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
Does the spec allow it t
On Dec 2, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated
to the JIRA inst
On 12/01/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs
On Dec 1, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
>
>> On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
>>> I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to
>>> the JIRA instance:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/bro
On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
> On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
>> I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to
>> the JIRA instance:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-80
On 01/12/2013 18:29, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did.
"Webbug
On 12/1/13 10:29 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did. It's fr
I filed these bugs back in June. I noticed today that they were migrated to the
JIRA instance:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016742
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016743
I filed the bugs, though they say someone else did. It's frustrating that
suddenly I can't even commen
On Jun 17, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 17 June 2013 12:40, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 17/06/2013 11:05, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
>>
>> Here they are:
>>
>> 8016743: java.text.MessageFormat does n
On 17 June 2013 12:40, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 17/06/2013 11:05, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
>
> Here they are:
>
> 8016743: java.text.MessageFormat does not support java.time.* types
> 8016742: JAXB does not support java.ti
On 17/06/2013 11:05, Nick Williams wrote:
Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
Here they are:
8016743: java.text.MessageFormat does not support java.time.* types
8016742: JAXB does not support java.time.* types
Note that JAXB is maintained in an upstream pr
Thanks. I have filed two different bugs for these two different problems.
On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:20 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> The standard JDK bug tracker should be used to keep track of these.
>
> For info, Oracle is in control of integration of JSR-310 into other
> APIs, not JSR-310.
>
>
The standard JDK bug tracker should be used to keep track of these.
For info, Oracle is in control of integration of JSR-310 into other
APIs, not JSR-310.
Stephen
On 17 June 2013 09:40, Nick Williams
wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>
>> Currently, MessageFormat /on
On Jun 15, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
> Currently, MessageFormat /only/ supports SimpleDateFormat and instances of
> java.util.Date or java.util.Calendar for date/time values. Because of this,
> it's impossible to use Java 8 date/time types with any of the i18n and
> localization t
15 matches
Mail list logo