Hi Ulf.
On 9/23/2011 2:14 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 23.09.2011 01:29, schrieb Joe Darcy:
On 9/22/2011 2:07 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 19:18, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I'm wondering why you don't have moved concerning documentation
from sun.misc.* to java.lang.(Strict)Math. E.G.: The comment on
Am 23.09.2011 01:29, schrieb Joe Darcy:
On 9/22/2011 2:07 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 19:18, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I'm wondering why you don't have moved concerning documentation from sun.misc.* to
java.lang.(Strict)Math. E.G.: The comment on the scalb operations:
/*
* The scalb operation
On 9/22/2011 2:07 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 19:18, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I'm wondering why you don't have moved concerning documentation from
sun.misc.* to java.lang.(Strict)Math. E.G.: The comment on the scalb
operations:
/*
* The scalb operation should be reasonable ...
*/
To save s
Am 22.09.2011 19:18, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I'm wondering why you don't have moved concerning documentation from sun.misc.* to
java.lang.(Strict)Math. E.G.: The comment on the scalb operations:
/*
* The scalb operation should be reasonable ...
*/
To save some source code footprint and allow bette
I'm wondering why you don't have moved concerning documentation from sun.misc.* to
java.lang.(Strict)Math. E.G.: The comment on the scalb operations:
/*
* The scalb operation should be reasonable ...
*/
To save some source code footprint and allow better overview, I suggest to erase all javado
Without a deeper look, I discovered several ternary operators without spacing.
For better readability, it would be nice to insert some spaces. :-)
-Ulf
Am 17.09.2011 03:52, schrieb joe.da...@oracle.com:
Hello.
Please review the changes to address
7091682 "Move sun.misc.FpUtils code into j
PS I've added your comment to bug 6667086 "Double.doubleToLongBits(final
double value) contains inefficient test for NaN."
-Joe
On 9/18/2011 6:15 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Jeff.
I'll consider that for some possible future work.
Thanks,
-Joe
Jeff Hain wrote:
Hi.
There are some possible optim
Hi Jeff.
I'll consider that for some possible future work.
Thanks,
-Joe
Jeff Hain wrote:
Hi.
There are some possible optimizations for some methods.
For nextAfter(double,double) (same for float version), instead of
testing NaN-ity right away,
we can test most common (or at least regular) c
Alan Bateman wrote:
joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello.
Please review the changes to address
7091682 "Move sun.misc.FpUtils code into java.lang.Math"
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/7091682.0/
As implied by the synopsis, where appropriate JDK-implementation code
used to provide functi
Mike Duigou wrote:
I am curious why some of the tests still refer to FpUtils. For example:
Log10Tests.java:
156 up = Math.nextUp(1.0);
157 down = FpUtils.nextDown(1.0);
Would it be possible to further reduce or eliminate the references to FpUtils
fro
I am curious why some of the tests still refer to FpUtils. For example:
Log10Tests.java:
156 up = Math.nextUp(1.0);
157 down = FpUtils.nextDown(1.0);
Would it be possible to further reduce or eliminate the references to FpUtils
from the tests?
Mike
O
Hi.
There are some possible optimizations for some methods.
For nextAfter(double,double) (same for float version), instead of testing
NaN-ity right away,
we can test most common (or at least regular) cases first:
public static double nextAfter(double start, double direction) {
// Balancin
joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello.
Please review the changes to address
7091682 "Move sun.misc.FpUtils code into java.lang.Math"
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/7091682.0/
As implied by the synopsis, where appropriate JDK-implementation code
used to provide functionality in java.lang.
13 matches
Mail list logo
