Hi Mandy,
This looks good to me.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 31/07/2019 21:59, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Peter, Daniel
[...]
This is correct when this class is a subclass of C. A slight
clarification to indicate that aMethod's declaring class is C might
help. I also fixed another typo:
Hi Peter, Daniel
On 7/31/19 1:44 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 7/31/19 9:59 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi,
I think Daniel is talking about the "dispatch" semantics of
unreflectSpecial here, right Daniel?
Thanks for clarifying this.
The findSpecial / unreflectSpecial is a MethodHandle
Hi Peter, Mandy,
On 31/07/2019 09:44, Peter Levart wrote:
Expanding on this a little. The javadocs of MethodHandles.Lookup starts
talking about the Lookup factory methods methods and their equivalence
to bytecode instructions, but then present the equivalence between find*
and Java source
Hi Peter, Mandy,
On 31/07/2019 08:59, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi,
I think Daniel is talking about the "dispatch" semantics of
unreflectSpecial here, right Daniel?
Yes, exactly!
The findSpecial / unreflectSpecial is a MethodHandle equivalent for
bytecode instruction invokespecial (sans actual
On 7/31/19 9:59 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi,
I think Daniel is talking about the "dispatch" semantics of
unreflectSpecial here, right Daniel?
The findSpecial / unreflectSpecial is a MethodHandle equivalent for
bytecode instruction invokespecial (sans actual invoking).
invokespecial is
Hi,
I think Daniel is talking about the "dispatch" semantics of
unreflectSpecial here, right Daniel?
The findSpecial / unreflectSpecial is a MethodHandle equivalent for
bytecode instruction invokespecial (sans actual invoking). invokespecial
is typically used for implementing the
Think about aMethod is a protected method inherited from its superclass
T. To invoke aMethod, the receiver must be an instance of T or a
subclass of T.
Mandy
On 7/30/19 3:22 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Mandy,
380 * {@link
java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup#unreflectSpecial
Daniel noticed that `unreflectSpecial` is missing in the "Lookup Factory
Methods" section in the class spec. In fact there are a duplicated
`lookup.unreflect(aMethod)` row that might originally be for
`unreflectSpecial`. I fix the javadoc in this patch:
This patch fixes Lookup.unreflectSpecial to pass the declaring class of
Method being unreflected (rather than null) so that it can accurately
check if the special caller class is either the lookup class or a
superinterface of the declaring class.
Webrev:
