Thanks, pushed as https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242208
/Claes
On 2020-04-06 13:38, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look good to me.
-Chris.
On 6 Apr 2020, at 11:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
looks good and trivial to me. I'll sponsor.
/Claes
(I hope we can wrap up
The changes look good to me.
-Chris.
> On 6 Apr 2020, at 11:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> looks good and trivial to me. I'll sponsor.
>
> /Claes
>
> (I hope we can wrap up https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029019
> some day, soon)
>
> On 2020-04-03 12:19, Christoph Dreis
Hi,
looks good and trivial to me. I'll sponsor.
/Claes
(I hope we can wrap up https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029019
some day, soon)
On 2020-04-03 12:19, Christoph Dreis wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the JDK itself still uses Method.getParameterTypes().length in a
couple of places.
Hi,
I noticed that the JDK itself still uses Method.getParameterTypes().length in a
couple of places.
This could be replaced with Method.getParameterCount() to avoid unnecessary
cloning overhead.
While this is often optimized away, I guess it's still good to not rely on
that. Additionally,
