Changeset: fa24eba012bd
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-03-15 09:02 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/fa24eba012bd
5053846: javac: MethodRef entries are duplicated in the constant pool
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Lower.j
Bug description:
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8006193
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006193
Here is the suggested trivial fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-8006193/
Summary:
Makes [FindBug] code analyzer happy.
-public void finalize() {
+
On 15/03/2013 09:20, Alexey Utkin wrote:
Summary:
Makes [FindBug] code analyzer happy.
-public void finalize() {
+protected void finalize() {
This looks fine to me, it's a package-private class so there's no issue.
-Alan.
On 03/14/13 23:25, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Doing a mini-audit of these methods, here is a change to what seems to be the
intent:
Yes, thanks! This keeps the exception specs consistent across similar
methods.
-Doug
Index: ./java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture.java
Changeset: 195b71850b56
Author:mnunez
Date: 2013-03-15 13:39 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/195b71850b56
8007767: TargetAnnoCombo.java need to be updated to add a new test mode
Reviewed-by: jjg, strarup
! test/tools/javac/annotations/repeatingAnnotation
On 15/03/2013 12:00, Doug Lea wrote:
On 03/14/13 23:25, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Doing a mini-audit of these methods, here is a change to what seems to
be the
intent:
Yes, thanks! This keeps the exception specs consistent across similar
methods.
Now that I reread these method descriptions, I t
Changeset: 46ad8dfabd5f
Author:sundar
Date: 2013-03-15 19:30 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/46ad8dfabd5f
8010136: Make jrunscript's init.js to work on nashorn
Reviewed-by: lagergren, hannesw
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/script/shell/init.js
I concur too, I will chat with the Objectweb folks and see what needs to
be done.
Kumar
- Original Message -
On 14/03/2013 14:03, A. Sundararajan wrote:
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8010083/
Thanks
-Sundar
This looks okay to me but do we want to be changing the A
2013/3/4 2:58 -0800, joe.da...@oracle.com:
> On 02/28/2013 11:31 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> 2013/2/23 5:10 -0800, joe.da...@oracle.com:
>>> Having Supported take a boolean value both allows the explicit statement
>>> that an item is not supported as well as providing a possible transiti
On 03/15/2013 02:12 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
2013/3/4 2:58 -0800, joe.da...@oracle.com:
On 02/28/2013 11:31 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
2013/2/23 5:10 -0800, joe.da...@oracle.com:
Having Supported take a boolean value both allows the explicit statement
that an item is not su
10 matches
Mail list logo
