On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
Yes. This
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
You're
This is an approach to adding a flag to jlink that will allow --compress to
take the same types of arguments as jmod, thus bringing the two into alignment.
This likely requires a CSR and a discussion on whether we should deprecate or
simply remove the original numeric compression arguments.
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
Marked as
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
Looks good
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
Does it
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:34:37 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
>> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
>> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
>>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:53:31 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
> behavior
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:32:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
> behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
> `Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
CSR?
The example in `Scanner` directly uses `System.in` which may cause unwanted
behavior when the default charset and the console charset differ. Using
`Console.reader()` is more appropriate. Also changed examples into snippets.
-
Commit messages:
- 8297288: Example code in Scanner
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:53:31 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
> behavior
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:16:19 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> > What version of GCC are you using?
>
> gcc 11.3 with libubsan 11.2
>
> Also it seem to big overlap with -Wcast-align(=strict) for the
> warnings/errors I see and I do like that warning. Do you have an idea if the
> coverage are pretty
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:17:24 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster
wrote:
> The change in [JDK-8283415](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283415) made
> use of the now available `sealed` keyword for `FinalReference`.
>
> Unfortunately this introduced a problem for the Espresso VM (Java on
>
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:37:17 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:35:47 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
>> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
>> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:23:04 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Hi Roger , the new proposed version JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION_DO is now almost as
> lengthy as the original coding, Is it really worth it introducing a macro
> when it gets so lengthy ?
Its easier to understand the flow and cleanup being
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:37:17 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:53:31 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
> behavior
The change in [JDK-8283415](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283415) made
use of the now available `sealed` keyword for `FinalReference`.
Unfortunately this introduced a problem for the Espresso VM (Java on Truffle):
Since Espresso is written in Java it uses the functionality of the "Host
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 13:46:07 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> What version of GCC are you using?
gcc 11.3 with libubsan 11.2
Also it seem to big overlap with -Wcast-align(=strict) for the warnings/errors
I see and I do like that warning.
Do you have an idea if the coverage are pretty much the same
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:53:31 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
> behavior
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:53:31 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing
> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM).
> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined
> behavior
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:37:17 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
> Newer version of IntelliJ IDEA introduces new
> [inspection](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-301797/IDEA-should-report-redundant-array-length-check-in-certain-cases)
> detecting redundant array length check in snippets like
>
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:20:26 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We have a number of places in the codebase where a macro could help when we
> check an exception and afterwrads free something and return.
Hi Roger , the new proposed version JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION_DO is now almost as
lengthy as the
24 matches
Mail list logo
