> We can use `Comparator.naturalOrder()` for cases when a `TreeMap` instance is
> constructed without comparator. This allows to squash two branches in
> `TreeMap.get()` into one.
>
> P.S. I think the comment of `TreeMap.getEntryUsingComparator()` is outdated.
> Should we also change it?
Serge
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:11:34 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Passing the constant node through as an input as suggested by @iwanowww and
>> @sviswa7 meant we could eliminate most of the `instruct` blocks, removing a
>> significant chunk of code and a little bit of complexity from the propos
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 21:39:05 GMT, Bill Huang wrote:
> This task converts 5 manual tests to automated tests.
>
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirsDefaultPolicy.java
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirsChange.java
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirs.java
> java/securit
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 23:21:42 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java may fail at future date.
>> I used following standalone testcase
>>
>> import java.util.Calendar;
>> import java.util.Date;
>> import java.util.SimpleTimeZone;
>>
>> public class C
> ViewportOverlapping was failing intermittently on Windows (Win10 & 11). Added
> robot.setAutoWaitForIdle() to ViewportOverlapping and its base class
> (OverlappingTestBase) to stabilize the test.
>
> Additionally added awt & swings tests to exclusiveAccess.dir in TEST.ROOT.
Harshitha Onkar ha
This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
-
Commit messages:
- Add jdk/internal/util to jdk_util_other test group
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11769/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.or
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11769
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
LGTM; Test fixes are ok for JDK 20 backport.
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:47:30 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
>> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
>
> LGTM; Test fixes are ok for JDK 20 backport.
@RogerRiggs
> LGTM; Test fixes are ok for JDK 20 backport.
Than
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
Or you can push to 21 and then use the lightweight "/backport" command.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
OK, I guess I'll need to withdraw this PR and open a new one against JDK 20.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
I think backporting should do in this case (and simpler)
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11769
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:49:42 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> Thanks. Do you think I should push this into JDK 20 instead of 21?
Yes, if the test should be run (and has not been running) pushing to 20 will
get it running sooner on the release that ships next.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.o
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:14:23 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This problem has two sides.
>> One is that the `VirtualThread::run() `cashes the field `notifyJvmtiEvents`
>> value.
>> It caused the native method `notifyJvmtiUnmountBegin()` not called after the
>> field `notifyJvmtiEvents`
>> value
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
Yeah it would probably be simpler but it would clutter up the history. I've
already started cloning jdk20 anyway, n
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:57:29 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
> test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java may fail at future date.
> I used following standalone testcase
>
> import java.util.Calendar;
> import java.util.Date;
> import java.util.SimpleTimeZone;
>
> public class CheckDST
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/117
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:37:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> This test isn't part of any test group, so it isn't being run regularly! I'm
> adding it to the jdk_util_other test group.
Closing this in favor of PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk20/pull/73 on JDK 20.
-
PR: https://git.open
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:25:39 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> It was running as part of tier4 (which is kind of a catch-all tier) but since
> it's (an internal) part of java.util, it should really be in tier1. This adds
> the test/jdk/jdk/internal/util directory to the :jdk_util_other test group.
Ma
It was running as part of tier4 (which is kind of a catch-all tier) but since
it's (an internal) part of java.util, it should really be in tier1. This adds
the test/jdk/jdk/internal/util directory to the :jdk_util_other test group.
-
Commit messages:
- 8299237: add ArraysSupport.ne
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:25:39 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> It was running as part of tier4 (which is kind of a catch-all tier) but since
> it's (an internal) part of java.util, it should really be in tier1. This adds
> the test/jdk/jdk/internal/util directory to the :jdk_util_other test group.
Th
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 18:15:07 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> ViewportOverlapping was failing intermittently on Windows (Win10 & 11).
>> Added robot.setAutoWaitForIdle() to ViewportOverlapping and its base class
>> (OverlappingTestBase) to stabilize the test.
>>
>> Additionally added awt & swing
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:48:24 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> *Headful* tests are not supposed concurrently: they display UI and often use
>> Robot to send input events to the UI. Running such tests concurrently leads
>> to obscure failures. In our CI system, `JTREG_JOBS=1` is passed to `make`
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
