Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v4]

2023-02-15 Thread Ioi Lam
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 01:42:16 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: >> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. >> This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name >> and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant >> work,

Re: RFR: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Martin Doerr
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:30:00 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote: >> This fixes the linked issue by trimming the caller of a frame to be >> deoptimized back to its `unextended_sp` iff it is compiled. The creation of >> the section `dead after deoptimization` shown in the attachment >>

Re: RFR: 8299748: java/util/zip/Deinflate.java failing on s390x

2023-02-15 Thread Amit Kumar
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:15:28 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >I assume you can quickly check which loop, I suspect it's the deflate loop >based of the previous comments/experiments. Both of loop's are inf-loops with this change. If somehow I terminate the first loop then second goes into infinite

Withdrawn: 8296935: Arrays.asList().set() with wrong types throws undocumented ArrayStoreException

2023-02-15 Thread Tingjun Yuan
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 02:35:19 GMT, Tingjun Yuan wrote: > Document `java.util.Arrays.asList` that the list will throw an > `ArrayStoreException` when attempting to set an element with a wrong type. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. - PR:

Re: RFR: 8296935: Arrays.asList().set() with wrong types throws undocumented ArrayStoreException [v8]

2023-02-15 Thread Tingjun Yuan
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 04:39:20 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> I've written a CSR report for this PR as below. Could someone please help >> me to submit it to the JBS if it looks okay? Thank you! >> >> --- >> >> **Compatibility Risk:** minimum >> >> **Compatibility Risk Description:** No

Re: RFR: 8296935: Arrays.asList().set() with wrong types throws undocumented ArrayStoreException [v8]

2023-02-15 Thread Stuart Marks
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:33:57 GMT, Tingjun Yuan wrote: >> Tingjun Yuan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Update Arrays.java > > I've written a CSR report for this PR as below. Could someone please help me > to submit it to

Re: RFR: 8293667: Align jlink's --compress option with jmod's --compress option [v8]

2023-02-15 Thread Ian Graves
> This is an approach to adding a flag to jlink that will allow --compress to > take the same types of arguments as jmod, thus bringing the two into > alignment. This likely requires a CSR and a discussion on whether we should > deprecate or simply remove the original numeric compression

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v4]

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, > this also impacts build reproducibility for native image

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v3]

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, > this also impacts build reproducibility for native image

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 22:44:21 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: >> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. >> This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name >> and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant >> work,

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 22:44:21 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: >> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. >> This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name >> and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant >> work,

Integrated: JDK-8302026: Port fdlibm inverse trig functions (asin, acos, atan) to Java

2023-02-15 Thread Joe Darcy
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:03:14 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > Proceeding down the line of FDLIBM functions to be ported, next up are asin, > acos, and atan. > > Diffs of the various versions will follow in a separate message. > > There were no unusual coding idioms encountered in porting these

Re: RFR: JDK-8301444: Port fdlibm hyperbolic transcendental functions to Java [v11]

2023-02-15 Thread Joe Darcy
> Initial pass of porting FDLIBM sinh/cosh/tanh to Java. I do intend to > refactor the regression tests a bit to reduce duplication, but the actual > ports should be ready for review. > > Diff'ing the ports as before, original vs transliteration port: > > > $ diff -w Hyperbolic.c

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, > this also impacts build reproducibility for native image

Re: RFR: JDK-8302026: Port fdlibm inverse trig functions (asin, acos, atan) to Java [v3]

2023-02-15 Thread Joe Darcy
> Proceeding down the line of FDLIBM functions to be ported, next up are asin, > acos, and atan. > > Diffs of the various versions will follow in a separate message. > > There were no unusual coding idioms encountered in porting these methods. Joe Darcy has updated the pull request

Integrated: 8302163: Speed up various String comparison methods with ArraysSupport.mismatch

2023-02-15 Thread Claes Redestad
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:59:24 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: > We can improve various String methods such as `startsWith`, `endsWith` and > `regionMatches` by leveraging the intrinsified mismatch methods in > `ArraysSupport`. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 861e3020 Author:

Re: RFR: 8302163: Speed up various String comparison methods with ArraysSupport.mismatch [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Claes Redestad
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:10:14 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> We can improve various String methods such as `startsWith`, `endsWith` and >> `regionMatches` by leveraging the intrinsified mismatch methods in >> `ArraysSupport`. > > Claes Redestad has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Re: RFR: JDK-8302026: Port fdlibm inverse trig functions (asin, acos, atan) to Java [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:13:16 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> Proceeding down the line of FDLIBM functions to be ported, next up are asin, >> acos, and atan. >> >> Diffs of the various versions will follow in a separate message. >> >> There were no unusual coding idioms encountered in porting these

Re: RFR: 8293667: Align jlink's --compress option with jmod's --compress option [v7]

2023-02-15 Thread Ian Graves
> This is an approach to adding a flag to jlink that will allow --compress to > take the same types of arguments as jmod, thus bringing the two into > alignment. This likely requires a CSR and a discussion on whether we should > deprecate or simply remove the original numeric compression

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread Brian Goetz
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:46:47 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: >> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. >> This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name >> and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant >> work,

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Re: RFR: 8292914: Introduce a system property that enables stable names for lambda proxy classes [v7]

2023-02-15 Thread Brian Goetz
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:46:43 GMT, Strahinja Stanojevic wrote: >> This PR introduces an option to output stable names for the lambda classes >> in the JDK. A stable name consists of two parts: The first part is the >> predefined value `$$Lambda$` appended to the lambda capturing class, and the

Re: RFR: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Richard Reingruber
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:35:52 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier wrote: >> Richard Reingruber has updated the pull request incrementally with three >> additional commits since the last revision: >> >> - Improve comment >> - Improve comment >> - Spelling > > src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp line

Re: RFR: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false [v2]

2023-02-15 Thread Richard Reingruber
> This fixes the linked issue by trimming the caller of a frame to be > deoptimized back to its `unextended_sp` iff it is compiled. The creation of > the section `dead after deoptimization` shown in the attachment >

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread Brian Goetz
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Re: RFR: 8293667: Align jlink's --compress option with jmod's --compress option [v6]

2023-02-15 Thread Ian Graves
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:23:02 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> I think that deprecating the entire plugin could be appropriate, given the >> overhead, unless there's some performance data to the contrary. I haven't >> seen much in favor of keeping it, but I do think that breaking it apart from >>

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Integrated: JDK-8301460: Clean up LambdaForm to reference BasicType enums directly

2023-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:05:15 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: > `LambdaForm` declares int constants for `BasicType::ordinal` to workaround > JDK-8161245. Now these int constants are no longer needed.This removes > these int constants and reference `BasicType` enums directly. This pull request

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Re: RFR: 8293667: Align jlink's --compress option with jmod's --compress option [v6]

2023-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:56:27 GMT, Ian Graves wrote: >> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/CompactConstantPoolsPlugin.java >> line 48: >> >>> 46: >>> 47: public CompactConstantPoolsPlugin() { >>> 48: super("compact-constant-pools"); >> >> This plugin

Re: RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote: > The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, >

Re: 8302590: Add String.indexOf(int ch, int fromIndex, int toIndex)

2023-02-15 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
Thanks Roger. Let's say you have a `String` that is structured in lines, and for each line you need to count the occurrences (0 or more) of some character. A way to process a line is to first search for the next '\n' from the current position, then to seach for that character starting from the

RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, this also impacts build reproducibility for native image generators

Re: RFR: 8292914: Introduce a system property that enables stable names for lambda proxy classes [v7]

2023-02-15 Thread David M . Lloyd
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:46:43 GMT, Strahinja Stanojevic wrote: >> This PR introduces an option to output stable names for the lambda classes >> in the JDK. A stable name consists of two parts: The first part is the >> predefined value `$$Lambda$` appended to the lambda capturing class, and the

Re: 8302590: Add String.indexOf(int ch, int fromIndex, int toIndex)

2023-02-15 Thread Roger Riggs
Hi Raffaello, What's the use case, can you give an example? Seems reasonable; would you also add `lastIndexOf(int ch, int fromIndex, int toIndex)`? Not intrinsified, but for symmetry. Regards, Roger On 2/15/23 10:47 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: Hello, Currently `String` does not expose

8302590: Add String.indexOf(int ch, int fromIndex, int toIndex)

2023-02-15 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
Hello, Currently `String` does not expose a method `indexOf(int ch, int fromIndex, int toIndex)`, where the 3rd parameter limits the search to positions up to it (exclusive). JBS issue [1] has been filed as an “Enhancement” to add it to the codebase. Before preparing a PR and a CSR, I would

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v19]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and > benchmarks initial drop into JDK. > > Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating, > and transforming ([JDK-8294957](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294957)) > will chain to this one.

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:05:10 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:45:32 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/constantpool/MemberRefEntry.java >> line 62: >> >>> 60: * {@return whether this member is a method} >>> 61: */ >>> 62: boolean isMethod(); >> >> this seems surprising -

Re: RFR: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false

2023-02-15 Thread Martin Doerr
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:10:08 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote: > This fixes the linked issue by trimming the caller of a frame to be > deoptimized back to its `unextended_sp` iff it is compiled. The creation of > the section `dead after deoptimization` shown in the attachment >

Re: RFR: 8293667: Align jlink's --compress option with jmod's --compress option [v6]

2023-02-15 Thread Ian Graves
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:20:03 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Ian Graves has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Fixing up resources > > src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/CompactConstantPoolsPlugin.java >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:04:22 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:18:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:24:58 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 15:07:01 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v18]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and > benchmarks initial drop into JDK. > > Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating, > and transforming ([JDK-8294957](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294957)) > will chain to this one.

Re: RFR: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false

2023-02-15 Thread Goetz Lindenmaier
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:10:08 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote: > This fixes the linked issue by trimming the caller of a frame to be > deoptimized back to its `unextended_sp` iff it is compiled. The creation of > the section `dead after deoptimization` shown in the attachment >

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v12]

2023-02-15 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:32:32 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: >> The habit of opening resources in a TwR is hard to break, but I guess it's >> ok for a test like this. I have inlined the method and removed the TwR. > >> The habit of opening resources in a TwR is hard to break, but I guess it's >> ok

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> After finding a hash match, getEntryPos needs to compare the lookup name up > to the encoded entry name in the CEN. This comparison is done by decoding the > entry name into a String. The names can then be compared using the String > API. This decoding step adds a significat cost to this

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v12]

2023-02-15 Thread Lance Andersen
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:55:04 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote: > The habit of opening resources in a TwR is hard to break, but I guess it's ok > for a test like this. I have inlined the method and removed the TwR. Agree, thanks for addressing the suggestion as it makes the test cleaner given

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v14]

2023-02-15 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> After finding a hash match, getEntryPos needs to compare the lookup name up > to the encoded entry name in the CEN. This comparison is done by decoding the > entry name into a String. The names can then be compared using the String > API. This decoding step adds a significat cost to this

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v17]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and > benchmarks initial drop into JDK. > > Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating, > and transforming ([JDK-8294957](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294957)) > will chain to this one.

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v12]

2023-02-15 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:12:38 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Eirik Bjorsnos has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Prefer expectThrows with asserts over test annotation regex > >

Integrated: 8302325: Wrong comment in java.base/share/native/libjimage/imageFile.hpp

2023-02-15 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:12:15 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Could I please get a review of this trivial comment-only change? > `imageFile.hpp` > describes some properties of the jimage file `lib/modules`. However, I don't > think > the comment example matches current code in the JDK. >

Re: RFR: 8301873: Avoid string decoding in ZipFile.Source.getEntryPos [v13]

2023-02-15 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> After finding a hash match, getEntryPos needs to compare the lookup name up > to the encoded entry name in the CEN. This comparison is done by decoding the > entry name into a String. The names can then be compared using the String > API. This decoding step adds a significat cost to this

Re: RFR: 8302325: Wrong comment in java.base/share/native/libjimage/imageFile.hpp [v3]

2023-02-15 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 19:30:19 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Could I please get a review of this trivial comment-only change? >> `imageFile.hpp` >> describes some properties of the jimage file `lib/modules`. However, I don't >> think >> the comment example matches current code in the JDK. >>

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:17:30 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > > src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Classfile.java line

Integrated: JDK-8300808: Accelerate Base64 on x86 for AVX2

2023-02-15 Thread Scott Gibbons
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 00:15:10 GMT, Scott Gibbons wrote: > Added code for Base64 acceleration (encode and decode) which will accelerate > ~4x for AVX2 platforms. > > Encode performance: > **Old:** > > Benchmark (maxNumBytes) Mode Cnt Score Error > Units >

Re: RFR: JDK-8300808: Accelerate Base64 on x86 for AVX2 [v17]

2023-02-15 Thread Claes Redestad
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:22:32 GMT, Scott Gibbons wrote: >> Added code for Base64 acceleration (encode and decode) which will accelerate >> ~4x for AVX2 platforms. >> >> Encode performance: >> **Old:** >> >> Benchmark (maxNumBytes) Mode Cnt Score Error >> Units

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:10:43 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:01:10 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> AttributeElement.Kind removal (#48) > >

Re: RFR: 8299748: java/util/zip/Deinflate.java failing on s390x

2023-02-15 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 02:25:00 GMT, Amit Kumar wrote: > After reverting all of my changes, I applied your patch and I got time limit > error, probably because of some inf-loop ? > > ``` > result: Error. Agent error: java.lang.Exception: Agent 2 timed out with a > timeout of 480 seconds; check

Re: RFR: 8294982: Implementation of Classfile API [v15]

2023-02-15 Thread Adam Sotona
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:01:57 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/constantpool/ClassEntry.java >> line 80: >> >>> 78: * Return a List composed by appending the additions to the base >>> list. >>> 79: * @param base The base elements