On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 01:52:13 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> JapaneseChronology is an IsoChronology so run the test again (before
>> committing) to make sure.
>
> `JapaneseChronology` is not extending `IsoChronology`, and that is the gist
> of the change I suggested.
I added the testcase of
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:56:47 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Now I tried and it didn't compile It should have been
>> `t.query(TemporalQueries.chronology()) instanceof IsoChronology`
>
> JapaneseChronology is an IsoChronology so run the test again (before
> committing) to make sure.
> Address changes from JEP 445 to JEP 463.
>
> - Move from a SYNTHETIC unnamed class to a MANDATED implicit class.
>
> - Don't mark class on read.
>
> - Remove reflection and annotation processing related to unnamed classes.
>
> - Simplify main method search.
Jim Laskey has updated the pull
> Address changes from JEP 445 to JEP 463.
>
> - Move from a SYNTHETIC unnamed class to a MANDATED implicit class.
>
> - Don't mark class on read.
>
> - Remove reflection and annotation processing related to unnamed classes.
>
> - Simplify main method search.
Jim Laskey has updated the pull
> j.u.Formatter now prints "%tF" (iso standard date) and the result is
> incorrect when processing year < 0 or year >
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
add JapaneseChronology testcase
-
Changes:
-
> Address changes from JEP 445 to JEP 463.
>
> - Move from a SYNTHETIC unnamed class to a MANDATED implicit class.
>
> - Don't mark class on read.
>
> - Remove reflection and annotation processing related to unnamed classes.
>
> - Simplify main method search.
Jim Laskey has updated the pull
On 18/11/2023 06:46, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Hi Rob,
Delegating caller sensitive methods can be tricky.
Besides the obvious solutions with StackWalker and/or Lookup objects I've
sometimes used an abstract class that must be extended by users of my library.
This may be more trouble in your case
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:35:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Haven't tried, but I think `t.getChronology() instanceof IsoChronology`
>> should work
>
> Now I tried and it didn't compile It should have been
> `t.query(TemporalQueries.chronology()) instanceof IsoChronology`
JapaneseChronology is an
> j.u.Formatter now prints "%tF" (iso standard date) and the result is
> incorrect when processing year < 0 or year >
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
use t.query(TemporalQueries.chronology()) instanceof
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 22:04:58 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> @MBaesken I would appreciate it if you would try out this proposed change
> to see whether it fixes the problem that you reported. Thanks!
Hi Brian, I added your patch to our tests.
-
PR Comment:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:54:48 GMT, suchismith1993 wrote:
> The math library in AIX specifically, is a static archive. Doing a -lm wont
> suffice, because when the symbols are looked up using dlsym or accessing
> native code through Java, it will lead to failures.
> Hence we had to come up with
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:39:49 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The syslookup.c solution for Windows looks interesting. While it is still a
> hard-coded list, at least you will get compile time errors if the include
> file changes to mismatch with the symbols...
I don't think AIX has a way to
12 matches
Mail list logo