Re: [External] : Re: OpenJDK 17: Loitering AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode instances (also on latest master branch) [JDK-8325754]

2024-02-19 Thread Frank Kretschmer
e what the option are. 🙂 Cheers, √ * * *Viktor Klang* Software Architect, Java Platform Group Oracle ---- *From:* Frank Kretschmer *Sent:* Sunday, 18 February 2024 15:36 *To:* Jaikiran Pai ; Viktor Klang ; Java Core Libs *Subj

Re: OpenJDK 17: Loitering AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode instances (also on latest master branch) [JDK-8325754]

2024-02-18 Thread Frank Kretschmer
A). This guide https://openjdk.org/guide/ should help you get started. It can then go through the usual reviews that a bug fix/enhancement goes through. -Jaikiran On 11/02/24 7:27 pm, Frank Kretschmer wrote: Hello Core-Libs-Dev team, may I ask you about your opinion about a tiny one-liner change

Re: OpenJDK 17: Loitering AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode instances (also on latest master branch)

2024-02-11 Thread Frank Kretschmer
ed thread pools for processing asynchronous tasks. Thank you all for your time and help! Best regards Frank Am 08.02.2024 um 12:15 schrieb Frank Kretschmer: Hello Thomas, hello Core-Libs-Dev, thank you for cc'ing my email. In deed my idea/suggestion is to modify the AbstractQueuedSy

Re: OpenJDK 17: Loitering AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode instances

2024-02-08 Thread Frank Kretschmer
e a suggestion for a change to the libraries similar to the mentioned JDK-6805775, and not actually GC, cc'ing the core-libs-dev mailing list. Hth,   Thomas On 07.02.24 15:20, Frank Kretschmer wrote: Hi Java GC-experts, I'm facing an interesting G1 garbage collector observation in