Re: RFR: 8278527: java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java fails nanoTime test

2024-02-22 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:49:31 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I get a review of this change which proposes to remove the `SystemTest` > from among the `JSR166TestCase`? > > As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8278527 the > `SystemTest.nanoTime` test has been intermittently failing si

Re: RFR: 8278527: java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java fails nanoTime test

2024-02-22 Thread Lance Andersen
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:49:31 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I get a review of this change which proposes to remove the `SystemTest` > from among the `JSR166TestCase`? > > As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8278527 the > `SystemTest.nanoTime` test has been intermittently failing si

Re: RFR: 8278527: java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java fails nanoTime test

2024-02-22 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:49:31 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I get a review of this change which proposes to remove the `SystemTest` > from among the `JSR166TestCase`? > > As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8278527 the > `SystemTest.nanoTime` test has been intermittently failing si

RFR: 8278527: java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java fails nanoTime test

2024-02-22 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Can I get a review of this change which proposes to remove the `SystemTest` from among the `JSR166TestCase`? As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8278527 the `SystemTest.nanoTime` test has been intermittently failing since a few years now. Martin and Paul have investigated this failu