Re: RFR: 8292407: Improve Weak CAS VarHandle/Unsafe tests resilience under spurious failures [v7]

2022-08-30 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
> We have a few reports that existing Weak* VarHandle tests are still flaky, > for example on large AArch64 machines or small RISC-V machines. > > The flakiness is intrinsic to the nature of Weak* operations under tests, > that can spuriously fail. The last attempt to fix these was > [JDK-81557

Re: RFR: 8292407: Improve Weak CAS VarHandle/Unsafe tests resilience under spurious failures [v7]

2022-08-30 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:18:11 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> We have a few reports that existing Weak* VarHandle tests are still flaky, >> for example on large AArch64 machines or small RISC-V machines. >> >> The flakiness is intrinsic to the nature of Weak* operations under tests, >> that can

Re: RFR: 8292407: Improve Weak CAS VarHandle/Unsafe tests resilience under spurious failures [v7]

2022-08-31 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:18:11 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> We have a few reports that existing Weak* VarHandle tests are still flaky, >> for example on large AArch64 machines or small RISC-V machines. >> >> The flakiness is intrinsic to the nature of Weak* operations under tests, >> that can

Re: RFR: 8292407: Improve Weak CAS VarHandle/Unsafe tests resilience under spurious failures [v7]

2022-09-01 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:18:11 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> We have a few reports that existing Weak* VarHandle tests are still flaky, >> for example on large AArch64 machines or small RISC-V machines. >> >> The flakiness is intrinsic to the nature of Weak* operations under tests, >> that can