Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v6]

2024-03-14 Thread Weijun Wang
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:53:40 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> revert changes to MBeanServerFileAccessController.java > > test/jdk/javax/security/auth/Subject/CallAsWithScopedValue.jav

Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v6]

2024-03-13 Thread Sean Mullan
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:56:58 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based >> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs. >> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the >> current subject di

Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v6]

2024-03-12 Thread Sean Mullan
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:56:58 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based >> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs. >> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the >> current subject di

Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v6]

2024-03-05 Thread Weijun Wang
> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based > authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs. > Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the > current subject differently. See the spec change in the `Subject.java` file