Re: RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0 [v2]

2023-04-14 Thread Joe Wang
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:45:45 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Upgrading the CLDR to [version >> 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual >> release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect >> regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in JDK20

Re: RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0 [v2]

2023-04-13 Thread Naoto Sato
> Upgrading the CLDR to [version > 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual > release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect > regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in JDK20/CLDRv42 > (https://inside.java/2023/03/28/quality-heads-

Re: RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0

2023-04-13 Thread Naoto Sato
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 20:46:10 GMT, Steven R. Loomis wrote: >> Upgrading the CLDR to [version >> 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual >> release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect >> regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in

Re: RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0

2023-04-13 Thread Steven R . Loomis
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 20:47:39 GMT, Steven R. Loomis wrote: >> Upgrading the CLDR to [version >> 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual >> release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect >> regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in

Re: RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0

2023-04-13 Thread Steven R . Loomis
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 20:20:02 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Upgrading the CLDR to [version > 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual > release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect > regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in JDK20/CLD

RFR: 8296248: Update CLDR to Version 43.0

2023-04-13 Thread Naoto Sato
Upgrading the CLDR to [version 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in JDK20/CLDRv42 (https://inside.java/2023/03/28/quality-heads-up/)