On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:53:41 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> `newStringUTF*NoRepl` is not described or expected to optimizing the array
> allocation. Nor does it mandate that callers must guarantee that the array is
> not re-used or modified. The access to this method through JavaLangAccess is
>
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:56:58 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
>> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
>> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
>> javadoc says.
>>
>> I ran the tier1
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:34:55 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> `JavaLangAccess::newStringUTF8NoRepl` and
> `JavaLangAccess::getBytesUTF8NoRepl` are not implemented correctly. They
> always copy arrays, rather than avoiding copying as much as possible as
> javadoc says.
>
> I ran the tier1 test without any
