> Currently it's O(n) - we do `n` shifts of bytes within `StringBuilder`. This
> can be reduced to O(1) improving the code like:
>
> DateTimeFormatter dtf = new DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
> .appendLiteral("Date:")
> .padNext(20, ' ')
> .append(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE)
> .toFormatter();
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 18:49:54 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> Currently it's O(n) - we do `n` shifts of bytes within `StringBuilder`. This
>> can be reduced to O(1) improving the code like:
>>
>> DateTimeFormatter dtf = new DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
>> .appendLiteral("Date:")
>> .padNext(20,
