> Java API has the `Thread.sleep(millis, nanos)` method exposed to users. The
> documentation for that method clearly says the precision and accuracy are
> dependent on the underlying system behavior. However, it always rounds up
> `nanos` to 1ms when doing the actual sleep. This means users can
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:55:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Java API has the `Thread.sleep(millis, nanos)` method exposed to users. The
>> documentation for that method clearly says the precision and accuracy are
>> dependent on the underlying system behavior. However, it always rounds up
>>
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:14:53 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adjust test times
>
> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 5263:
>
>> 5261: if (nanos_left > 0) {
>> 5262:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 08:12:50 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java line 1:
>>
>>> 1: /*
>>
>> Why doesn't `Thread.sleep(long millis)` simply call `Thread.sleep(millis,
>> 0)` instead of duplicating most of the code?
>
> That would change the stack de
