On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:38:31 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review the ISO 4217 amendment 175 update.
>
> There are no meaningful code changes, but the version number should be
> updated accordingly to be in sync.
Marked as reviewed by m4ximumpi...@github.com (no known OpenJDK username).
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:38:31 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review the ISO 4217 amendment 175 update.
>
> There are no meaningful code changes, but the version number should be
> updated accordingly to be in sync.
Marked as reviewed by srl...@github.com (no known OpenJDK username).
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:38:31 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review the ISO 4217 amendment 175 update.
>
> There are no meaningful code changes, but the version number should be
> updated accordingly to be in sync.
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).
> Do you track the legal tender date?
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:38:31 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review the ISO 4217 amendment 175 update.
>
> There are no meaningful code changes, but the version number should be
> updated accordingly to be in sync.
Do you track the legal tender date? Because that did change, for CLDR
Please review the ISO 4217 amendment 175 update.
There are no meaningful code changes, but the version number should be updated
accordingly to be in sync.
-
Commit messages:
- Update to 175
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13275/files
Webrev:
