On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:54:34 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> You haven't make the case for these changes, please describe the use cases
> when performance is a significant constraint on application performance. The
> changes largely just add more code to maintain without otherwise adding
> sufficien
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:05:19 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> improve date toString performance, includes:
>>
>> java.util.Date.toString
>> java.util.Date.toGMTString
>> java.time.Instant.toString
>> java.time.LocalDate.toString
>> java.time.LocalDateTime.toString
>> java.time.LocalTime.toString
>
> 温绍锦 has u
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:59:25 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> The performance of optimizing DateTimeFormatter cannot be as fast as using
>> ixed-length buffer directly.
>
> Of course, the optimization of DateTimeFormatter is more general, and we can
> spend time doing it later. The format of toString is fixe
> improve date toString performance, includes:
>
> java.util.Date.toString
> java.util.Date.toGMTString
> java.time.Instant.toString
> java.time.LocalDate.toString
> java.time.LocalDateTime.toString
> java.time.LocalTime.toString
温绍锦 has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
