On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:33:27 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Review comments
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 33:
>
>> 31:
>> 32: /* @test
>> 33: *
On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:34:17 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 25:
>>
>>> 23:
>>> 24: /* @test
>>> 25: * @bug 4162796 4162796 8320448
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> * @bug 8320448
>
> As I said above: I never add old bug numbers to new tests. But
On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:33:16 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Review comments
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 25:
>
>> 23:
>> 24: /* @test
>> 25: *
On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:30:45 GMT, Scott Gibbons wrote:
>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only
>> using AVX2 instructions. This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average
>> 1.3x for AVX2. The benchmark numbers:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark
> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only
> using AVX2 instructions. This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average
> 1.3x for AVX2. The benchmark numbers:
>
>
> BenchmarkScore
> Latest
