On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:14:53 GMT, Iris Clark wrote:
> Verified `synchronized` keyword removed from method declaration as in
> upstream source.
Thanks!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16829#issuecomment-1828441202
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:17:50 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> This looks OK.
>
> Please add a the appropriate label given there is no test included with this
> change so that you do not get asked later where is the test ;-)
Added a label and note. Thanks!
-
PR Comment: https://git.op
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:24:35 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
> Applying an update from the upstream source, quote: "Removing synchronized
> from the getInstance() methods". As the reporter noted, this change was made
> 16 years ago.
>
> Tests: SQE & unit tests passed
This looks OK.
Please add a the ap
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:24:35 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
> Applying an update from the upstream source, quote: "Removing synchronized
> from the getInstance() methods". As the reporter noted, this change was made
> 16 years ago.
>
> Tests: SQE & unit tests passed
Verified `synchronized` keyword remo
Applying an update from the upstream source, quote: "Removing synchronized from
the getInstance() methods". As the reporter noted, this change was made 16
years ago.
Tests: SQE & unit tests passed
-
Commit messages:
- 8320602: Lock contention in SchemaDVFactory.getInstance()
Chan
