Updated the version to 23-ea and year to 2024.
This initial generation also picks up the unpublished changes from:
- [JDK-8302233](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302233) (keytool &
jarsigner)
- [JDK-8290702](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290702) (javadoc) (JDK 23
backport)
- [JDK-8
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:46:01 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 23-ea and year to 2024.
>
> This initial generation also picks up the unpublished changes from:
>
> - [JDK-8302233](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302233) (keytool &
> jarsigner)
> - [JDK-8290702](https://bugs
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:46:01 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 23-ea and year to 2024.
>
> This initial generation also picks up the unpublished changes from:
>
> - [JDK-8302233](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302233) (keytool &
> jarsigner)
> - [JDK-8290702](https://bugs
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:17:05 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Thanks for doing this, David. I only note that the changes for JDK-8321384
> were published in [JDK-8308715](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308715),
> which was integrated in the mainline before JDK 22 RDP 1. So they are already
> pr
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:01:17 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Initially I wondered if JDK-8309981 should be separated but include keeps
> things in sync so I think okay.
Thanks for the review @AlanBateman .
Yeah I was in two minds there myself. I started fixing
[JDK-8309981](https://bugs.openjdk.or
> Updated the version to 23-ea and year to 2024.
>
> This initial generation also picks up the unpublished changes from:
>
> - [JDK-8302233](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302233) (keytool &
> jarsigner)
> - [JDK-8290702](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290702) (javadoc) (JDK
> 23 ba
