Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Doug Lea
On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:09:51 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 41 additional commits >> since

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Doug Lea
On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:19:52 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 41 additional commits >> since

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Doug Lea
On Wed, 29 May 2024 13:26:10 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 41 additional commits >> since

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Viktor Klang
On Wed, 29 May 2024 11:33:40 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of >> cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further >> adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in >> deployments with

Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v7]

2024-05-29 Thread Doug Lea
> This set of changes address causes of poor utilization with small numbers of > cores due to overly aggressive contention avoidance. A number of further > adjustments were needed to still avoid most contention effects in deployments > with large numbers of cores Doug Lea has updated the pull r