Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v3]

2024-04-26 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and > currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and > remove module `jdk.random`. Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: T

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v3]

2024-04-26 Thread Alan Bateman
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:41:21 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and >> currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and >> remove module `jdk.random`. > > Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request i

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v3]

2024-04-26 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:41:21 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and >> currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and >> remove module `jdk.random`. > > Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request i

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v3]

2024-04-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:45:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > How useful is it to deploy with additional RandomGenerator implementations on > the class path or module path? It doesn't look like in its current form it's possible (without an `--add-exports`) to have additional `java.util.random.Random