Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v7]

2024-06-04 Thread David Alayachew
On Wed, 8 May 2024 08:30:39 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and >> currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and >> remove module `jdk.random`. > > Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request in

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v7]

2024-06-04 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:41:48 GMT, David Alayachew wrote: > Hey, I'm just curious -- why was the solution to remove an entire module? I > understand the point of moving the relevant code over to `java.base`, but I > don't understand why removing the random module made sense. With the implementat

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v7]

2024-06-04 Thread David Alayachew
On Wed, 8 May 2024 08:30:39 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and >> currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and >> remove module `jdk.random`. > > Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request in

Re: RFR: 8330005: RandomGeneratorFactory.getDefault() throws exception when the runtime image only has java.base module [v7]

2024-05-08 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
> Move all random generators mandated in package `java.util.random` and > currently implemented in module `jdk.random` to module `java.base`, and > remove module `jdk.random`. Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: R