On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:54:17 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:54:17 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:54:17 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:09:24 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/InnerClassLambdaMetafactory.java
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Mandy Ch
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:09:24 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
> This doesn’t fix the case where the lambda is created from an instance
> method, e.g.:
>
Yes, unfortunately the fix is limited to invokeStatic (see the comments above).
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18810#issuec
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:54:17 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>
> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
> handling of `useImplMethodHandle`.
> The patch also fixes `j/l/
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:08:31 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:08:31 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:39:11 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> applied suggested changes
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/defineHiddenClass/src/Lambda.java line 28:
>
>> 26: public class
> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>
> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
> handling of `useImplMethodHandle`.
> The patch also fixes `j/l/
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:51:55 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special han
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:58:59 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Do we also need to check if the parameters or return type are hidden classes?
I think this is already failing and will continue to fail. Don't think we need
special error messages for this case.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openj
> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>
> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
> handling of `useImplMethodHandle`.
> The patch also fixes `j/l/
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:14:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special hand
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:46:59 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>
> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
> handling
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:46:59 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>
> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
> handling
Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas in
hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the special
handling of `useImplMethodHandle`.
The patch also fixes `j/l/i/defineHidd
18 matches
Mail list logo
