On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:50:44 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> This PR adds a check for the format of ProblemList files and ensures they
>> only have entries referring to existing tests.
>>
>> The cleanups in the second commit of this PR were done based on the output
>> of `CheckProblemLists`:
>>
>>>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:50:44 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> This PR adds a check for the format of ProblemList files and ensures they
>> only have entries referring to existing tests.
>>
>> The cleanups in the second commit of this PR were done based on the output
>> of `CheckProblemLists`:
>>
>>>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:14:02 GMT, Ludvig Janiuk wrote:
> While not a blocker IMO, I'm curious about the issues for the removed lines.
> Taking the first one as an example, I see it's "unresolved" (JDK-8192647) but
> the file was removed in JDK-8289764. I don't see any other mentions of
> "prob
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:50:44 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> This PR adds a check for the format of ProblemList files and ensures they
>> only have entries referring to existing tests.
>>
>> The cleanups in the second commit of this PR were done based on the output
>> of `CheckProblemLists`:
>>
>>>
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:00:52 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
> This PR adds a check for the format of ProblemList files and ensures they
> only have entries referring to existing tests.
>
> The cleanups in the second commit of this PR were done based on the output of
> `CheckProblemLists`:
>
>> make t
> This PR adds a check for the format of ProblemList files and ensures they
> only have entries referring to existing tests.
>
> The cleanups in the second commit of this PR were done based on the output of
> `CheckProblemLists`:
>
>> make test TEST=build/problemLists/CheckProblemLists.java
> .
