> I have implemented the Zimmermann's square root algorithm, available in works 
> [here](https://inria.hal.science/inria-00072854/en/) and 
> [here](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220532560_A_proof_of_GMP_square_root).
> 
> The algorithm is proved to be asymptotically faster than the Newton's Method, 
> even for small numbers. To get an idea of how much the Newton's Method is 
> slow,  consult my article [here](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07751), in which 
> I compare Newton's Method with a version of classical square root algorithm 
> that I implemented. After implementing Zimmermann's algorithm, it turns out 
> that it is faster than my algorithm even for small numbers.

fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'patchSqrt' of https://github.com/fabioromano1/jdk into 
patchSqrt
 - Added JMH benchmark class for Square Root

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19710/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19710/files/67c44eee..a6559a56

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19710&range=07
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19710&range=06-07

  Stats: 110 lines in 2 files changed: 109 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19710.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19710/head:pull/19710

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19710

Reply via email to