> With the domain change from openjdk.java.net to openjdk.org, references to
> URLs in the sources should be updated.
>
> Updates were made using a shell script. I"ll run a copyright updater before
> any push.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
sinc
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:11:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> With the domain change from openjdk.java.net to openjdk.org, references to
>> URLs in the sources should be updated.
>>
>> Updates were made using a shell script. I"ll run a copyright updater before
>> any push.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated th
Thanks for catching that Iris; I'll changes those to git URLs.
-Joe
On 9/29/2022 9:11 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:11:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
With the domain change from openjdk.java.net to openjdk.org, references to URLs
in the sources should be updated.
Updates were made
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:11:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> With the domain change from openjdk.java.net to openjdk.org, references to
>> URLs in the sources should be updated.
>>
>> Updates were made using a shell script. I"ll run a copyright updater before
>> any push.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated th
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 04:05:51 GMT, Iris Clark wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> http -> https
>
> src/jdk.accessibility/windows/native/include/bridge/AccessBridgeCalls.h line
> 34:
>
>> 32: * the follo
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:16:24 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> src/jdk.accessibility/windows/native/include/bridge/AccessBridgeCalls.h line
>> 34:
>>
>>> 32: * the following link:
>>> 33: *
>>> 34: *
>>> http://hg.openjdk.org/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/raw-file/tip/src/jdk.accessibility/windows/native/bridge/A
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:11:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> With the domain change from openjdk.java.net to openjdk.org, references to
>> URLs in the sources should be updated.
>>
>> Updates were made using a shell script. I"ll run a copyright updater before
>> any push.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated th
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:59:12 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Also, FWIW, there are 100+ hits in `test` as well. But that is so many it
> might warrant a separate PR..?
Yes; I think it is sufficient to update src and doc with this PR.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10501
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:38:54 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> This is correct. AccessBridge.h is published with the include/header files of
> the JDK and anyone reading it there can't exactly make use of "../"
Update to persistent git links.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10501
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:38:54 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Why do we need to link to a URL? Why not `../../bridge/AccessBridgeCalls.c`?
>
> This is correct.
> AccessBridge.h is published with the include/header files of the JDK and
> anyone reading it there can't exactly make use of "../"
Thanks @pr
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 20:25:28 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Also, FWIW, there are 100+ hits in `test` as well. But that is so many it
> might warrant a separate PR..?
Filed a few follow-up bugs:
JDK-8294724: Update openjdk.java.net => openjdk.org in tests (umbrella)
JDK-8294725: Update openjdk.java.n
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:17:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> > Also, FWIW, there are 100+ hits in `test` as well. But that is so many it
> > might warrant a separate PR..?
>
> Filed a few follow-up bugs:
>
> JDK-8294724: Update openjdk.java.net => openjdk.org in tests (umbrella)
> JDK-8294725: Update
12 matches
Mail list logo
