On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:40:36 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Modified to < 0 as proposed by Alan Batement
>
> Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
@bplb Kindly requesting to
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:53:04 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is true, but if a broken subclass sets markpos to less than -1 then
>> lots of code lines will work incorrectly -- including `transferTo` which was
>> the starting point of your change proposal. So do you really only want undo
>>
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 14:08:40 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Fixes JDK-8294702
>
> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Modified to < 0 as proposed by Alan Batement
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:53:04 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is true, but if a broken subclass sets markpos to less than -1 then
>> lots of code lines will work incorrectly -- including `transferTo` which was
>> the starting point of your change proposal. So do you really only want undo
>>
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 14:04:45 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>>> This is true, but if a broken subclass sets markpos to less than -1 then
>>> lots of code lines will work incorrectly -- including `transferTo` which
>>> was the starting point of your change proposal. So do you really only want
>>> undo
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:53:04 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is true, but if a broken subclass sets markpos to less than -1 then
>> lots of code lines will work incorrectly -- including `transferTo` which was
>> the starting point of your change proposal. So do you really only want undo
>>
> Fixes JDK-8294702
Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Modified to < 0 as proposed by Alan Batement
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10528/files
- new:
