re-libs-dev on behalf of Brett
> Okken
> *Sent:* Monday, July 28, 2025 4:59 PM
> *To:* Roger Riggs
> *Cc:* core-libs-dev@openjdk.org
> *Subject:* Re: String encodeUTF8 latin1 with negatives
>
> Roger,
>
> For a String, the byte[] val is immutable, right?
> And even th
: Roger Riggs
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: String encodeUTF8 latin1 with negatives
Roger,
For a String, the byte[] val is immutable, right?
And even the current behavior of checking for negatives and then cloning would
not be safe in the face of a concurrent modification, right?
Is
Roger,
For a String, the byte[] val is immutable, right?
And even the current behavior of checking for negatives and then cloning
would not be safe in the face of a concurrent modification, right?
Is there something else going on here which I am missing?
Thanks,
Brett
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 3:1
Hi Brett,
Extra care is needed if the input array might be modified concurrently
with the method execution.
When control flow decisions are made based on array contents, the
integrity of the result depends on reading each byte of the array
exactly once.
Regards, Roger
On 7/27/25 4:45 PM,
