Makes sense, thanks!
From: Philip Race
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 2:41 PM
To: Yagnatinsky, Mark : IT (NYK) ;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: stack overflow in regex engine
CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organisation -
philip.r...@oracle.com<mailto:phili
om:*Philip Race
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 22, 2024 11:54 AM
*To:* Yagnatinsky, Mark : IT (NYK) ;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.org
*Subject:* Re: stack overflow in regex engine
CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organisation -
philip.r...@oracle.com Do not click on links, open attachments, or
he original author might never be heard from again.
Anyway, thanks a bunch for responding; I was worried that no one would.
From: Philip Race
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 11:54 AM
To: Yagnatinsky, Mark : IT (NYK) ;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.org
Subject: Re: stack overflow in regex engine
CAUTION:
P4 is the default JBS priority, so sometimes it just means no one
figured out the true priority.
But in general P4 bugs could be open for years, or even never get fixed.
The priority is also partially an assessment of where it falls as a
priority for the JDK developers.
A user of JDK may have a
(Sorry about my previous "do I need to subscribe?" email; in retrospect that
was needless noise.)
The purpose of this email is twofold: first, inquire about the status of ticket
filed a few years ago, and second to point out some non-obvious reasons why it
might be slightly more serious than it
