Re: [core-workflow] instructions for cherrypicking a change from master

2016-10-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 09, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>It probably makes more sense to assume a successful backport as the >>default case > > We'll have to see. Maybe Python's code won't change so much between major > versions, but I've been o

Re: [core-workflow] instructions for cherrypicking a change from master

2016-10-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 09, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >It probably makes more sense to assume a successful backport as the >default case We'll have to see. Maybe Python's code won't change so much between major versions, but I've been on projects where refactorings and other changes do result in mos