Re: [core-workflow] Choosing a prefix/label for issue numbers

2017-02-06 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 04.02.2017 00:24, Brett Cannon wrote: > It looks like people in general prefer "bpo-" (sorry, Ned and MAL). No worries. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Experts (#1, Feb 06 2017) >>> Python Projects, Coaching and Consulting ...

Re: [core-workflow] Choosing a prefix/label for issue numbers

2017-02-01 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 01.02.2017 20:02, Ned Deily wrote: > On Feb 1, 2017, at 12:43, Brett Cannon wrote: >> Historically commit messages for CPython have had the form of "Issue #: >> did something". The problem is that Github automatically links "#" to >> GitHub issues (which includes

Re: [core-workflow] My initial thoughts on the steps/blockers of the transition

2016-01-05 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 05.01.2016 06:53, Ezio Melotti wrote: >> Or is there some prepackaged service that >> we can use that will keep track of this which would cause us to not use >> Roundup (which might be easier, but depending on the service require >> everyone to re-sign)? There's also the issue of supporting

Re: [core-workflow] PEP 481 repo URL branding

2015-12-16 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 15.12.2015 19:03, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Dec 15, 2015, at 09:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> I would hope it would be hosted on GitHub. Getting out of the sysadmin >> business is one of my goals here. > > The two aren't mutually exclusive. For PEP 507, I propose a donated and > managed