Re: [core-workflow] We will be moving to GitHub

etting up the webhooks between the two wasn't hard and code review was a much better experience.  Just my 2c. Agreed. Our current Rietveld setup is superior and much less distracting. Like the Rietveld house vs. Victorian architecture. Stefan Krah ___

Re: [core-workflow] We will be moving to GitHub

ften. Sorry for starting this subthread during your vacation (I missed that), I hope you can enjoy the remaining days! Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-w

Re: [core-workflow] We will be moving to GitHub

thil (on python-committers) no one has even bothered to post an explicit +1 for GitHub. It's very disappointing that GitHub proponents apparently felt the need to contact you privately instead of stating their opinions in the open. Stefan Krah ___

Re: [core-workflow] Software Factory

M.-A. Lemburg writes: > On 30.12.2015 20:03, Stefan Krah wrote: > > I don't care if they have been profitable by selling private repos on a > > small/medium scale, the direction they're heading in is quite clear: > > > > Get people (esp. young ones) t

Re: [core-workflow] Software Factory

nes) to work for free on OSS projects using gamification, cute icons, "social" coding, and a fake hero-of-work ethos fueled by "longest streak" statistics. When these people are ready to enter the job market, they can be brought in contact with employers. Stefan Krah

Re: [core-workflow] Software Factory

Brett Cannon writes: > I believe you have to make your profile public for that to be viewable. I've just created a test account and cannot find any setting to hide the profile. On the other hand, there's a setting "Jobs profile: available for hire&

[core-workflow] Questions about the core workflow

[Guido] > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Krah gmail.com> wrote: >> Since 5 years or so stating any kind of opinion that >> remotely resembles the original free software principles (by that I >> don't mean necessarily Stallman's views, just

[core-workflow] Questions about the core workflow

x27;ll probably give up and move my private projects there, too, because honestly I'm tired of constantly defending minority opinions.] Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cor

[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflow

itLab, etc. that had at least one absolutely glaring own-the-world (write access to all repos) security hole. Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed b

[core-workflow] Other thoughts on the workflow

mpared to almost 99% of other projects. I like it better than both GitHub/GitLab. Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code o

[core-workflow] Software Factory

ublishing aggregate data like https://github.com/torvalds , which by my (European) privacy point of view is already stretching and exceeding the limits of good taste. Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@

[core-workflow] Software Factory

l like working for Andreessen & Horowitz for free if we move there. Stefan Krah ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct