Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-21 Thread Brett Cannon
Everyone who expressed an opinion seems to explicitly prefer Travis over CircleCI, so that solves that debate. :) I did end up disabling macOS builds as Travis has under-provisioned those machines to the point that it adds an extra hour to the CI run (goes from 1.5 hours to under 30 minutes by rem

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-21 Thread Brett Cannon
Thanks for testing out the trusty environment! That did seem to fix the test failures related to datetime (the doc failure is expected). On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 at 06:39 Elvis Pranskevichus wrote: > On Monday, November 21, 2016 8:46:55 PM EST INADA Naoki wrote: > > > Ignore the > > > fact that the d

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-21 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 at 19:43 Berker Peksağ wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test has configurations for > both > > CircleCI and Travis. If I'm missing something in either configuration > then > > please let me know (e.g.

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-21 Thread Elvis Pranskevichus
On Monday, November 21, 2016 8:46:55 PM EST INADA Naoki wrote: > > Ignore the > > fact that the doc tests are failing as I have fixed that in Python 3.6 and > > 3.7 already. > > test_datetime fails too on Travis-CI. > https://travis-ci.org/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/jobs/177187425#L5962 > > +1 f

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-21 Thread INADA Naoki
> Ignore the > fact that the doc tests are failing as I have fixed that in Python 3.6 and > 3.7 already. test_datetime fails too on Travis-CI. https://travis-ci.org/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/jobs/177187425#L5962 +1 for Travis-CI, if we can fix it. -- INADA Naoki

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-19 Thread Maciej Szulik
+1 for Travis for its readability and knowledge with it 0 for CircleCI On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Berker Peksağ wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test has configurations for > both > > CircleCI and Travis. If I'm mi

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-18 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test has configurations for both > CircleCI and Travis. If I'm missing something in either configuration then > please let me know (e.g. there is still a free container to use on > CircleCI). If I also

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-18 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:26 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Otherwise please look at the output of both CI services and let it be known > which service you prefer (i.e. +1/+0/-0/-1 for both services). Ignore the > fact that the doc tests are failing as I have fixed that in Python 3.6 and > 3.7 alr

Re: [core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-18 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 19 November 2016 at 11:26, Brett Cannon wrote: > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test has configurations for both > CircleCI and Travis. If I'm missing something in either configuration then > please let me know (e.g. there is still a free container to use on > CircleCI). If I also mi

[core-workflow] CircleCI or Travis?

2016-11-18 Thread Brett Cannon
https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test has configurations for both CircleCI and Travis. If I'm missing something in either configuration then please let me know (e.g. there is still a free container to use on CircleCI). If I also missed a better CI service then also let me know (but I don't