Having examples in the templates could instill more consistency and
hopefully prevent errors as my first attempt failed (did not like bpo- in
the first (summary) line.
Do not forget clear instructions for when you cannot, for whatever reason,
use blurb add.
Sent from my iPhoneTenzij hierboven
2017-11-27 16:29 GMT+01:00 Berker Peksağ :
> thanks.rust-lang.org basically dumps all author names without giving
> zero context. Contributor A might just a fix a typo or contribute a
> non-trivial feature. There is no way to figure it out without doing
> some research.
>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> "Patch by" was useful with Mercurial which didn't allow to store an
> author and a committer. Git now stores the author and the committer:
>
> vstinner@apu$ git show --pretty=full
>
"Patch by" was useful with Mercurial which didn't allow to store an
author and a committer. Git now stores the author and the committer:
vstinner@apu$ git show --pretty=full
5b48dc638b7405fd9bde4d854bf477dfeaaddf44 --stat
commit 5b48dc638b7405fd9bde4d854bf477dfeaaddf44
Author: Jonas Haag
+1.
Related question: Should the news entry include "Patch by ?". I
noticed some entries have this, some don't. Is there a rule?
Thanks.
___
core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to