Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-10 Thread Ethan Furman
On 10/10/2017 11:51 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: I just merged the PR and went with "I have made the requested changes; please review again". Figured this makes people aware that they are to have addressed the changes before requesting a review and has them saying "please". :) Plus there's no way a

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-10 Thread Brett Cannon
I just merged the PR and went with "I have made the requested changes; please review again". Figured this makes people aware that they are to have addressed the changes before requesting a review and has them saying "please". :) Plus there's no way anyone will accidentally type that in conversation

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-10 Thread Ethan Furman
On 10/08/2017 09:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: I actually wouldn't want the bot name in the trigger phrase since you're not addressing the bot but the reviewer(s). So using something that is unambiguous as a trigger phrase like "please re-review" or "please review again" that won't come up in con

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-08 Thread Brett Cannon
See https://github.com/python/bedevere/pull/66 for a PR to support an additional, more muted trigger phrase (currently "Please review again"). On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 09:44 Brett Cannon wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 00:55 Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> On 8 October 2017 at 07:38, Donald Stufft wrote:

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 00:55 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 8 October 2017 at 07:38, Donald Stufft wrote: > >> Currently the workflow for CPython development requires people to say 'I >> didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition’ in order to request a re-review of >> their work. Can we please use a phrase

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-08 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 8 October 2017 at 07:38, Donald Stufft wrote: > Currently the workflow for CPython development requires people to say 'I > didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition’ in order to request a re-review of > their work. Can we please use a phrase for this that makes more sense > rather than, as Alex pu

Re: [core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-07 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > .. Leave it in as an Easter egg if you like (and probably should for > backwards compatibility > anyways), but please make something else be the primary phrase. > I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition. :-)

[core-workflow] Use something other than an In-joke for Trigger Phrases

2017-10-07 Thread Donald Stufft
Currently the workflow for CPython development requires people to say 'I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition’ in order to request a re-review of their work. Can we please use a phrase for this that makes more sense rather than, as Alex put it, “magic inside baseball language”. In jokes can be