Chatting to an experienced C/C++ developer at PyCon AU today, they
were worried that their *Python* skills might not be good enough to
contribute to CPython. It reminded me of an idea I had a while ago,
but forgot to suggest: adding a keyword specifically to indicate
issues that require some C codi
Hi Nick,
I'm not particularly enamoured of that specific keyword name, so I'm
interested in two specific kinds of feedback:
1. Does the extra keyword sound useful?
Yes, IMHO it's useful
Just complementary info about the context where the new keyword should
be used is [1] (AFAIK):
buildb
On 03/08/2014 14:23, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Chatting to an experienced C/C++ developer at PyCon AU today, they
were worried that their *Python* skills might not be good enough to
contribute to CPython. It reminded me of an idea I had a while ago,
but forgot to suggest: adding a keyword specifically
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 14:23, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> Chatting to an experienced C/C++ developer at PyCon AU today, they
>> were worried that their *Python* skills might not be good enough to
>> contribute to CPython. It reminded me of an idea I had
Dear core-devs,
I would like to ask about the differences between (from the devguide [1]):
a) stage:needs patch and keywords:patch
b) stage:patch review and keywords:needs review
Aren't those redundant? Why are those keywords needed?
IMHO the keywords ones could be refactored out. Doesn't a issue
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:19 PM, francis wrote:
> Dear core-devs,
> I would like to ask about the differences between (from the devguide [1]):
> a) stage:needs patch and keywords:patch
Stage can only be set by "Developers", the "patch" keyword can be
added by anyone and it's added automatica
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Chatting to an experienced C/C++ developer at PyCon AU today, they
> were worried that their *Python* skills might not be good enough to
> contribute to CPython. It reminded me of an idea I had a while ago,
> but forgot to suggest: adding
On 4 Aug 2014 09:37, "Ezio Melotti" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Chatting to an experienced C/C++ developer at PyCon AU today, they
> > were worried that their *Python* skills might not be good enough to
> > contribute to CPython. It reminded me of an
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:19 PM, francis wrote:
>> Dear core-devs,
>> I would like to ask about the differences between (from the devguide [1]):
>> a) stage:needs patch and keywords:patch
>
> Stage can only be set by "Developers", the "patch"