I don't think this will be a shock to anyone who has followed the
discussion on this list. The decision is essentially based on:
1. No major distinguishing features between GitHub or GitLab
2. Familiarity amongst core devs -- and external contributors -- with
GitHub
3. Guido prefers Gi
Brett Cannon writes:
> I don't think this will be a shock to anyone who has followed the
discussion on this list. The decision is essentially based on:
We must have been reading different discussions: On *this* list more
people were in favor of GitLab! Except for Guido, Donald and Senthil
(on pyt
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 20:25:11 +, Stefan Krah
wrote:
> Brett Cannon writes:
> > I don't think this will be a shock to anyone who has followed the
> discussion on this list. The decision is essentially based on:
>
> We must have been reading different discussions: On *this* list more
> people
On 2 Jan 2016 07:37, "R. David Murray" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 20:25:11 +, Stefan Krah <
[email protected]> wrote:
> > Brett Cannon writes:
> > > I don't think this will be a shock to anyone who has followed the
> > discussion on this list. The decision is essentially based o
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I don't think this will be a shock to anyone who has followed the discussion
> on this list. The decision is essentially based on:
>
> No major distinguishing features between GitHub or GitLab
> Familiarity amongst core devs -- and externa
(Sorry, accidentally hit send while trying to discard a previous draft)
On 2 Jan 2016 11:17, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2016 07:37, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> > Now, the fact that people felt it better to contact Brett privately to
> > advocate for GitHub is indeed interesting, and yes, di
