Re: [core-workflow] Updated draft of PEP 512

2016-01-22 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 at 20:24 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 22 January 2016 at 03:21, Brett Cannon wrote: > > If I remember correctly, the original argument for not going generic is > > there is no guarantee future VCSs will have similar semantics that will > fit > > into whatever tuple or dict struct

Re: [core-workflow] Updated draft of PEP 512

2016-01-22 Thread Maciej Szulik
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Bot to handle pull request merging > '' > As stated in the section entitled > "`Document steps to commit a pull request`_", the desire is to > maintain a linear history for cpython. Unfortunately, > Github's [#

Re: [core-workflow] Updated draft of PEP 512

2016-01-22 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 at 14:44 Maciej Szulik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> Bot to handle pull request merging >> '' >> As stated in the section entitled >> "`Document steps to commit a pull request`_", the desire is to >> maintai