[core-workflow] Re: "Awaiting merge" label for PRs from core devs

2018-09-06 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:37 Zachary Ware wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:31 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > So the reasoning behind setting "awaiting merge" is because the "needs" > label is meant to represent what is holding up the PR from being closed, > and so a PR from a core dev is really

[core-workflow] Re: "Awaiting merge" label for PRs from core devs

2018-09-06 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:37 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:37 Zachary Ware wrote: >> What about no label at all on core dev PRs by default, but if one gets >> added the standard flow is followed? > > > I would be fine with that. What do others think? +1 If no one beats me to