[coreboot] Local server for Coreboot

Hello! Any issues with my setting up a local server for my Coreboot trees? Of course this does presuppose a problem. I am familiar with doing so via the now discontinued CVS methods, but what about doing so via SVN? I would imagine that I've got the complete documentation here, but I am looking f

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. "

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. " Thanks, mart, and sorry for the trouble :-) ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [v3] r1166 - coreboot-v3/northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation

Author: mraudsepp Date: 2009-05-10 01:36:20 +0200 (Sun, 10 May 2009) New Revision: 1166 Modified: coreboot-v3/northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/i440bx.c Log: Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. " This reverts r1162 because r1161 was a better and more universal fix. Signed-

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. "

On 10.05.2009 1:28 Uhr, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. " > > This reverts r1162 because r1161 was a better and more universal fix. > > Signed-off-by: Mart Raudsepp > Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer > --- > northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/i440bx.c

[coreboot] [PATCH] Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. "

Revert "This is an emergency fix for building for qemu. " This reverts r1162 because r1161 was a better and more universal fix. Signed-off-by: Mart Raudsepp --- northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/i440bx.c |5 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/northbridge/in

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Abstraction for flash mapping/unmapping

On 09.05.2009 14:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Flash mapping/unmapping was performed without an abstraction layer, so > even the dummy flasher caused memory mappings to be set up. > Add map/unmap functions to the external flasher abstraction. > > Fix a possible scribble-over-low-memory corner

Re: [coreboot] flashrom: First successful --programmer dummy run

On 09.05.2009 16:03, Joseph Smith wrote: > On Sat, 09 May 2009 14:11:11 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > wrote: > >> flashrom --programmer dummy -V >> >> > YAHOO! Carl-Daniel you rock :-) > Thanks! Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.corebo

Re: [coreboot] seemingly wrong code in src/arch/i386/boot/coreboot_table.c

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Myles Watson wrote: > Acked-by: Myles Watson Thanks, I got so worried about the problem that I went and self-acked, I appreciate your ack. Committed revision 4264. ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [coreboot] seemingly wrong code in src/arch/i386/boot/coreboot_table.c

> -Original Message- > From: ron minnich [mailto:rminn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:27 PM > To: Myles Watson > Cc: coreboot > Subject: Re: [coreboot] seemingly wrong code in > src/arch/i386/boot/coreboot_table.c > > Found the problem. 4240 broke builtd_option_tbl due to

[coreboot] [v2] r4264 - trunk/coreboot-v2/util/options

Author: rminnich Date: 2009-05-09 19:14:58 +0200 (Sat, 09 May 2009) New Revision: 4264 Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/util/options/build_opt_tbl.c Log: I would have liked to get an ack, but the error this corrects is pretty critical, since unless it is fixed this tool creates empty tables that ca

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: fix typo in p4m80 board enable.

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Luc Verhaegen. > Fix biostar p4m80 board enable typo. > > Obvious typo due to inb/outb versus wbsio_ argument ordering confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen Jep. Acked-by: Uwe Hermann Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de

[coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: fix typo in p4m80 board enable.

Luc Verhaegen. Fix biostar p4m80 board enable typo. Obvious typo due to inb/outb versus wbsio_ argument ordering confusion. Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen Index: board_enable.c === --- board_enable.c (revision 490) +++ board_ena

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Add EPOX 8k5a2.

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > Add support for EPOX 8K5A2 and separate out common VT823x board enable code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen > > Thanks, I committed it in r490 after solving one

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Add EPOX 8k5a2.

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Add support for EPOX 8K5A2 and separate out common VT823x board enable code. > > Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen Thanks, I committed it in r490 after solving one conflict with latest svn and some minor cosmetics. Uwe. -- http://www

[coreboot] [flashrom] r490 - trunk

Author: uwe Date: 2009-05-09 16:26:04 +0200 (Sat, 09 May 2009) New Revision: 490 Modified: trunk/board_enable.c Log: Add support for EPoX EP-8K5A2 and separate out common VT823x board enable code. Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen Acked-by: Uwe Hermann Modified: trunk/board_enable.c ==

Re: [coreboot] flashrom: First successful --programmer dummy run

On Sat, 09 May 2009 14:11:11 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > flashrom --programmer dummy -V > YAHOO! Carl-Daniel you rock :-) -- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Abstraction for flash mapping/unmapping

Flash mapping/unmapping was performed without an abstraction layer, so even the dummy flasher caused memory mappings to be set up. Add map/unmap functions to the external flasher abstraction. Fix a possible scribble-over-low-memory corner case which fortunately never triggered so far. With this p

[coreboot] [flashrom] r489 - trunk

Author: hailfinger Date: 2009-05-09 09:32:30 +0200 (Sat, 09 May 2009) New Revision: 489 Modified: trunk/flashrom.c Log: Kill one superfluous variable and improve code readability. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Modified: trunk/flashrom.c

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Fix Elan SC520 handling

On 09.05.2009 06:58, ron minnich wrote: > Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich > > Wonder if anyone out there has an sc520 any more? > Thanks, committed in r488. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/list

[coreboot] [flashrom] r488 - trunk

Author: hailfinger Date: 2009-05-09 09:27:23 +0200 (Sat, 09 May 2009) New Revision: 488 Modified: trunk/flashrom.c Log: Fix Elan SC520 handling. flashbase is a variable which should never be set outside chipset code. It is only used to calculate the base address of the flash space at exactly o

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Trim default ICH SPI delay from 1000 to 10 microseconds

On 09.05.2009 05:42, Myles Watson wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > wrote: > >> Trim default ICH SPI delay from 1000 to 10 microseconds. Since many >> commands take around 10 microseconds to complete, it is totally >> pointless to wait for 1000 microseconds befor

[coreboot] [flashrom] r487 - trunk

Author: hailfinger Date: 2009-05-09 09:24:23 +0200 (Sat, 09 May 2009) New Revision: 487 Modified: trunk/ichspi.c Log: Trim default ICH SPI delay from 1000 to 10 microseconds. Since many commands take around 10 microseconds to complete, it is totally pointless to wait for 1000 microseconds befor