2009/9/10 ron minnich :
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sebastian Lara wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. My cluster is finnally up. The installation went
>> fine
>
> If you have onesis questions don't hesitate to contact me. Also, what
> size cluster? Just curious.
>
It's a 10 node, 20 co
Also see the ICH5 EHCI programming manual:
http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/manual/298656.pdf
--Ed
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:13 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> I'm looking but don't see info yet on a USB debug port in ICH5, anyone know?
>
> The issue is that the Dell Server 1850 node I'm trying to get working
> doesn't give direct COM1 access to the P4; it goes through a (ack!
> Ptui!) baseboard maint
Hi,
I am using coreboot v3 with FILO.
I specify "qemu -L . vd.img -smp 4".
But I always see one cpu in /proc/cpuinfo.
Then I tried if SMP works in v2.
However, when I tried to boot, qemu showed the following error messages: (v3
works fine here)
Uncompressing coreboot to RAM.
Jumping to image.
Check
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sebastian Lara wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. My cluster is finnally up. The installation went
> fine
If you have onesis questions don't hesitate to contact me. Also, what
size cluster? Just curious.
thanks
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot
I'm looking but don't see info yet on a USB debug port in ICH5, anyone know?
The issue is that the Dell Server 1850 node I'm trying to get working
doesn't give direct COM1 access to the P4; it goes through a (ack!
Ptui!) baseboard maintenance controller. So to talk to COM1 you have
to know how to
Hi,
2009/9/6 Sebastian Lara :
> 2009/9/4 ron minnich :
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Sebastian Lara wrote:
>>
>>> Just because we start using ROCKS Clusters. Are there some cluster
>>> distributions that can run without local disk on nodes?
>>
>> Yes. I strongly suggest you take a look at th
Hey there,
I read the documents on the website.
But those documents cover the internal stages of coreboot.
I am more curious about how coreboot transfers control to the payload, where
the payload is loaded and the processor state, paging enabled or not.
Please give me some clues about how coreboot
Hi,
I am trying to remind myself what I need (or if it's even possible) to use a
payload that makes use of VGA on a Geode GX1/CS5530 system. I'd like to have a
bootloader payload that uses VGA instead of serial, if possible.
Now, I've got VGA enabled in the coreboot image I'm currently using, a
Uwe Hermann wrote:
>> We should probably try to have a "last known working version"
>> in the supported boards list on the wiki.
>>
>
> Hm, dunno, if the boards are removed from svn we could also remove them from
> the wiki table completely (or put them in a "supported in earlier revisions"
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:35:57AM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> >> we have been discussing to drop the PowerPC port completely if
> >> nobody is willing to step up and revive it. Comments?
> >
> > The old revs will stil
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Marc Jones wrote:
> I agree, We should probably try to have a "last known working version"
> in the supported boards list on the wiki.
agree. Let's clean out the attic. It makes it easier for people to
focus on the boards we do have.
ron
--
coreboot mailing lis
I'm working on it but I have to put a few things together first. I'm
reviving some old tools that make network booting more efficient. If
anyone cares, they're called beoboot.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>> we have been discussing to drop the PowerPC port completely if
>> nobody is willing to step up and revive it. Comments?
>
> The old revs will still be there.
>
> In a way I think this is fine for all boards. Unless som
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:13:02AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > Hi developers!
> >
> > I started creating a Kconfig status page in the Wiki at
> >
> > http://www.coreboot.org/Kconfig
> >
> > Currently all boards in there are marked "Unsupported". If you worked on
> > a
Author: stepan
Date: 2009-09-10 13:21:48 +0200 (Thu, 10 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 4629
Modified:
trunk/util/getpir/code_gen.c
trunk/util/getpir/pirq_routing.h
Log:
fix compilation issues for pirq checker tool (trivial)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
Modified: tr
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> we have been discussing to drop the PowerPC port completely if
> nobody is willing to step up and revive it. Comments?
The old revs will still be there.
In a way I think this is fine for all boards. Unless someone does the
work to update soon, there's no point in keeping
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Hi developers!
>
> I started creating a Kconfig status page in the Wiki at
>
> http://www.coreboot.org/Kconfig
>
> Currently all boards in there are marked "Unsupported". If you worked on
> a Kconfig port of a board, please change the status on that page, so we
> can see wh
Hi,
in the progress of restructuring coreboot to work with CBFS, Kconfig and
other new features, we basically broke the PowerPC boards. Since none of
us has any of the supported hardware available for testing, and there is
no real reason to use coreboot on PowerPC processors (there are fine
bootlo
19 matches
Mail list logo
