On 24.12.2009 00:56, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
> My question is fairly simple : Would people from the coreboot project agree
> to release the source code under a BSD-style Open Source licence instead of
> the GPL ?
>
Sorry, I don't see a way of that happening. Some of the code is derived
from
Misters,
Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. I
am currently working on a Virtualization Firmware and I would
greatly appreciate to go further into the ideas mentioned in the coreboot GSOC
project AVATT [1].
I am definitely aware about the UEFI Forum and
Dear coreboot readers!
This is the automatic build system of coreboot.
The developer "mjones" checked in revision 4992 to
the coreboot repository. This caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Fix technexion tim5690 build failure - REALMODE option required for x86.c
mainboard function to be b
> > Scan for VGA option rom
> > Got ps2 nak (status=51); continuing
> > ps2_recvbyte timeout
> >
> > I can't see your VGA ROM getting run anywhere. Did I just miss it?
> Nop, not working anywhere seems like Seabios doesn't find any vga rom.
You could try a more verbose setting for SeaBIOS and send
Author: mjones
Date: 2009-12-23 23:16:18 +0100 (Wed, 23 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4992
Modified:
trunk/src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Options.lb
Log:
Fix technexion tim5690 build failure - REALMODE option required for x86.c
mainboard function to be built.
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones
Acked-by:
> > This is broken, but I'm not sure if it's the dump or the register value.
> It
> > shouldn't affect the IO, though. That register looked fine. It seems
> like
> > IO is broken for you not to be able to start the other processors or
> > complete the mcp55 init.
> >
> > You could print out PCI
Dear coreboot readers!
This is the automatic build system of coreboot.
The developer "stepan" checked in revision 4991 to
the coreboot repository. This caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
newconfig compilation failed with
(.text+0x4989): undefined reference to `vgabios_init'
Signed-off-b
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 04:11:06PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> This is broken, but I'm not sure if it's the dump or the register value. It
> shouldn't affect the IO, though. That register looked fine. It seems like
> IO is broken for you not to be able to start the other processors or
> complet
Author: stepan
Date: 2009-12-23 20:46:36 +0100 (Wed, 23 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4991
Modified:
trunk/src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Config.lb
Log:
newconfig compilation failed with
(.text+0x4989): undefined reference to `vgabios_init'
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
Dear coreboot readers!
This is the automatic build system of coreboot.
The developer "mjones" checked in revision 4990 to
the coreboot repository. This caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add mainboard x86emu interrupt function support. Add tim5690 VGA BIOS
functions: int15 getting LCD p
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:27:19PM +0100, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> attached patch implements my tinybootblock concept (formerly known as
> newfailover) in Kconfig.
Very nice!
Thanks.
-Kevin
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Libra Li wrote:
> Hi Marc Jones,
>
> This is a new patch file. I modified mainboard_interrupt_handlers and
> setup_interrupt_handlers in the "util/x86emu/x86.c".
>
Hi Libra,
This looks good and passes abuild.
Acked-by: Marc Jones
r4990
Marc
--
http://ma
Author: mjones
Date: 2009-12-23 20:16:47 +0100 (Wed, 23 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4990
Added:
trunk/src/arch/i386/include/arch/interrupt.h
trunk/src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/vgabios.c
trunk/src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/vgabios.h
Modified:
trunk/src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Ma
coreboot ver: 4988
hw: atom + 945gse + ich7m + it8718
memory: 512M DDR2 SO-DIMM
memtest86+ ver: v2.11
screen:
===begin==
Memtest86+ v2.11
Atom (0.045) 1600Mhz
L1 cache: 24K 3125MB/s
L2 cache: 512K 1860MB/s
L3 cache: None
Memory: 0K
Chipset:
0K LinuxBIOS
===end==
complete log:
ht
Hi,
following the guidelines lined out in the coreboot FAQ the chipsets of this
board seem to be supported.
Just the board itself is unknown or not listed so far.
Any advice which board to select or howto extend an existing board
configuration would be helpful.
Please find attached the listings
Am 22.12.2009 23:17, schrieb Myles Watson:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Patrick Georgi
> mailto:patr...@georgi-clan.de>> wrote:
>
>
> - Provide a framework to build image selection logic
> In newconfig, most boards have their own code to select the image. The
> goal in this layout
Author: oxygene
Date: 2009-12-23 13:52:56 +0100 (Wed, 23 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4989
Added:
trunk/src/arch/i386/Makefile.bigbootblock.inc
trunk/src/arch/i386/Makefile.tinybootblock.inc
trunk/src/arch/i386/init/bootblock.c
trunk/src/arch/i386/init/bootblock_prologue.c
trunk/src/arch
17 matches
Mail list logo
